• Jessica
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -418 months ago

    Yeah, well, their R&D budget for this medicine cost something crazy like $3.5 trillion dollars, so it makes sense that they have to charge 200x the cost to make it.

        • @Nedlymandico
          link
          98 months ago

          Your seat is the source? I think we want something more like a hyperlink to data on the subject.

          • Jessica
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -48 months ago

            I’d try to make a hyperlink out of my ass, but that link is purple. Wait

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      88 months ago

      I am willing to bet they took government money to fund this. So I don’t really accept the argument that they need to price it that much to make profits. How much more profits is the only thin remaining to determine and I don’t have a lot of sympathy for sociopaths who claim they need so much.

    • @taanegl
      link
      88 months ago

      Wow, that would make the company bankrupt now. They owe HOW much?!?! Why haven’t they alone tanked the economy? Geez.

      • Jessica
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -98 months ago

        That’s what I’m saying! How is it they are able to stay afloat???

        • @Maalus
          link
          118 months ago

          Because it didn’t cost them 3.5 trillion to make it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            38 months ago

            It’s a peptide lol. A bond of amino acids. That’s why Chinese suppliers sell it for $5-10/vial in bulk and still make a shitload of money.

            Much wow, big pharma did drug AI a little sooner than the rest of them.

            Id development of these drugs costs as much as our GDP, they’re doing things seriously fucking wrong.