• @z00s
    link
    English
    226 months ago

    Are there no female gynecologists?

    • @NightAuthor
      link
      English
      216 months ago

      You’d kinda need to be a female gynecological researcher w clout, and then maybe like 40 years after you demonstrate a need for a new technique, it might start to catch on.

    • @dohpaz42
      link
      English
      46 months ago

      I would imagine that tolerating the pain was beaten into women for so long that at this point it would be futile to try to change it because they would be shamed and seen as weak.

    • @ReiRose
      link
      English
      -26 months ago

      So b your logic, do you believe some minority cops means no institutionalised racism in policing?

      • @z00s
        link
        English
        36 months ago

        I asked a question

        • @ReiRose
          link
          English
          26 months ago

          I don’t believe for a second that you didn’t know there were female gynecologists. You were attempting to shift blame, not ask questions and engage in meaningful discourse.

          • @z00s
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I was making people question the original premise that a. No gynecological procedures involve sedation b. That this still occurs universally and contemporaneously and c. That male doctors somehow have exclusive and universal control over procedures and have denied sedation out of deliberate malfeasance.

            You then tried to apply a false reading to an unrelated situation to create a false equivalency.

            Your comment was as ludicrous as saying, “You don’t like chocolate ice cream? So what you’re saying is that you support the bombing of Palestine!!!”

            • @ReiRose
              link
              English
              06 months ago

              If perhaps you explained yourself in the original comment, I would not have assumed incorrectly.

              Your question doesn’t even fully cover point c, let alone a and b. I’m not psychic 🤷‍♀️

              • @z00s
                link
                English
                16 months ago

                I didn’t have to, because it was a question. Your ridiculous response is on you, buddy 🤷‍♂️

                • @ReiRose
                  link
                  English
                  06 months ago

                  You absolutely didn’t have to. And my response is absolutely on me. If your goal was to be ambiguous with your question, you achieved it. If your goal was to outline points a, b and c above, you did not succeed.

                  • @z00s
                    link
                    English
                    06 months ago

                    You’re trying to impose a goal then claiming that I failed? You’re really telling on yourself here bud