• PatFusty
    link
    fedilink
    2069 months ago

    It was not ‘pictures of monkeys’ it was art. It was digital art. If you don’t get that then you don’t understand money laundering.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        439 months ago
        1. Joe gives Kevin $1mil worth of Cocaine.
        2. Joe draws an ape in MS paint.
        3. Kevin buys the digital ape drawing from Joe for $1mil in Bitcoin.

        That is how you launder money with art and Bitcoin.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          209 months ago

          Because it’s normally suspicious if someone gives $1mil for no reason, but if you know it’s for a monkey jpeg, then it’s normal.

          • @Sylvartas
            link
            99 months ago

            I have no idea if it attracted the attention of any regulatory body but yeah that’s pretty much how it went down as far as I know

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -79 months ago

          That’s not how it goes. Laundering works because you don’t have to report the sale, you just have to report the income. If you can track the sale then laundering never will work.

          • bruhduh
            link
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            deleted by creator