• @drislands
    link
    English
    2410 months ago

    I’m down for technology making use of otherwise-unused energy is great. But that prompts the question – is the oxygen it’s pulling from unused energy? Could this negatively affect the oxygenation of blood?

    • Sibbo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3010 months ago

      Probably. But if it means that you can have a lifetime heart pacemaker without ever changing batteries or external charging ports, that may be convenient. I mean, the tradeoff here is probably for people that are worried about more severe things than being a bit slower when jogging.

      • @drislands
        link
        English
        1410 months ago

        That’s a fair point. I suppose it depends on how much oxygen it takes, exactly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          And how well oxygenated the person is. If they’re chronically really anemic it might be a problem where it wouldn’t for a healthy person.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        Doesn’t a pacemaker last like 10 years now? It would still need battery I guess even though it charges by blood oxygen. Imagine having carbon monoxide poisoning but what killed the patient was the pacemaker that died.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 months ago

          Doesn’t a pacemaker last like 10 years now?

          Yes, but a nuclear pacemaker can last a lifetime.
          A bio-battery has that same advantage without containing a radioactive sample that needs to be removed when you die.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      How long until it’s turned into a weapon