JK Rowling has challenged Scotland’s new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.

The Harry Potter author, who lives in Edinburgh, described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

She said “freedom of speech and belief” was at an end if accurate description of biological sex was outlawed.

Earlier, Scotland’s first minister Humza Yousaf said the new law would deal with a “rising tide of hatred”.

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new crime of “stirring up hatred” relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism, posted on X on the day the new legislation came into force.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    -18 months ago

    And the US laws should be more like Scotland’s. Hate speech is implicitly violent and should be treated as such.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      The will never come to US because it would become a modern day witch hunt used for political purposes of whoever is in power at that time.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        08 months ago

        There is only one definition of hate speech.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            18 months ago

            There is no legal definition of “hate speech” under U.S. law, just as there is no legal definition for evil ideas, rudeness, unpatriotic speech, or any other kind of speech that people might condemn. Generally, however, hate speech is any form of expression through which speakers intend to vilify, humiliate, or incite hatred against a group or a class of persons on the basis of race, religion, skin color sexual identity, gender identity, ethnicity, disability, or national origin.

            https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/hate

            If librarians can figure this out, why can’t you?

              • Flying Squid
                link
                08 months ago

                Do you see anything about political ideology in that definition?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  And when the right gets elected we can consider any criticism of Christianity as hate speech and lock them up too. People never abuse their power.

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    0
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Weird how that hasn’t happened in any other country that has hate speech laws.

                    Is America special? Americans somehow need extra special freedom of speech?