• @jeffwOP
    link
    English
    0
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Jfc some people are dense. What is more likely, that sexual violence occurred as it has in literally every previous attack like this in human history. Or that Hamas acted like puritans while committing terrorism?

    Edit: there’s like one good point in your article (“Patten’s report functions as a distraction from genocide”), the rest is BS about not believing victims

    • @Linkerbaan
      link
      English
      28 months ago

      If there was any evidence israel would be screaming it from the rooftops and blasting it in 4k on some HamasUnleashedDotCom website.

      Desperately wanting it to be true doesn’t make it true. In fact israel has turned over every single stone for evidence and found none.

      • @jeffwOP
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I hope you never have to go through the trauma of rape while everyone screams “no evidence! People make this up all the time just to hurt men!” All over the internet. Your article literally says there were witnesses and victims shared their stories.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          If nobody made false rape claims, then we could trust everyone who says rape occurred.

          Israel, unfortunately, has a history of lying to make their enemies look bad.

        • @Linkerbaan
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          You can thank israel for lying about rape and using it as a tool to justify their Genocide.

          Also thank israel for intentionally “not preserving” any evidence of those fictional rapes despite womens rights groups screaming for it

          By the way israels earliest claims were extremely graphic and had high claims of evidence. That women had “nails driven through their vaginas by Hamas” and that there was photographic and video evidence of this.

          Patten has supposedly looked at those pictures and decided that a few blurred pixels with an incredibly wild IDF imagination do not constitute evidence for that whatsoever. Just a small indication of all the “evidence” the IDF made up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      We’re not talking about speculation.

      We’re talking about evidence.

      Funny how you shared a link that wasn’t actually evidence, and now you pivot to speculation while calling others “dense”.

      • @jeffwOP
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        Eyewitness evidence is not evidence? Do you know how many convictions don’t involve forensic evidence?