The authors argue that centuries of imperialism, extractive capitalism, and population growth have pushed Earth’s ecosystems beyond their limits, and created a broadening pattern of social inequality. The review summarizes the grave threats facing the planet but rejects a “doom and gloom” philosophy. Instead, the authors argue, the threats should motivate swift and substantial actions.

According to the authors, a global economic model focused on wealth accumulation and profit, rather than true sustainability, is a major impediment to decarbonization, conserving natural resources, and ensuring social equity. Therefore, the authors argue, governments should enforce radical, immediate cuts in fossil fuel use, eliminate environmentally harmful subsidies, and restrict trade that generates pollution or unsustainable consumption.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -28 months ago

    What is the empirical process these scientists used for determining what the human race collectively ought to do?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -5
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I threw it in ChatGPT for a summary as a curiosity but I know without reading that the scientists are beyond their qualifications in trying to presuppose why they are seeing what they are seeing and are well beyond in supposing how we could or should solve it. Much less why.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            Using technology is pathetic

            I’m not defending a thesis. I’m talking to nerds on Lemmy that already have their mind made up about pretty much everything. A summary from ChatGPT is the appropriate time investment.

    • Sims
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      It’s never nice to discover that what you’ve been told your whole life - was just capitalist propaganda…