• @jaybone
    link
    -918 months ago

    Subtle work there with the nose.

    • @LinkerbaanOP
      link
      648 months ago

      Both the press and the soldier have quite a large nose so that doesn’t seem to imply much.

        • @Leviathan
          link
          28 months ago

          If you look through his comics he does randomly color noses and this isn’t exactly what I’d consider to be a “Jewish nose”.

      • @jaybone
        link
        -628 months ago

        I didn’t say which nose.

      • @ganksy
        link
        -948 months ago

        As an artist myself, nothing is ever an accident. There wasn’t any need for it to tell the story. Using bigotry to describe genocide is a misstep.

        • @Aleric
          link
          35
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @glimse
            link
            148 months ago

            I looked at his Instagram before I left my comment (that agreed with you) and there’s a drawing of a middle eastern guy with a nose way closer to the stereotype on there, too.

            • @Aleric
              link
              11
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • @glimse
                link
                118 months ago

                I’m not just hesitant to claim it’s bigotry - I’m outright refusing to without further evidence for all the reasons you outlined. There’s nothing bigoted about the way the soldier is drawn because that’s not even accurate to the stereotype at all

                • @Aleric
                  link
                  88 months ago

                  deleted by creator

          • @ganksy
            link
            -218 months ago

            Make some shit up? It’s pink and unusually elongated with respect to the other characters. I’m not going to scour through the artist’s works to prove that it might be an accidental embellishment. If you make a comic that is not part of a series, it should be self contained.

            All the other details you pointed out are just strawman bullshit.

            What’s happening to Palestinians is genocide. It’s fucked beyond belief. This went from a poignant comic to something I don’t want to be associated with.

            • @Aleric
              link
              14
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • @ganksy
                link
                -38 months ago

                Four fingers, one floating eye, sclara? All straw-men that you ‘defeated’ to prove me wrong. I don’t comment on bigotry lightly. I know antisemitism is thrown around as much as comparisons to hitler in hyperbole these days.

                If someone has to look at your body of work to understand if you’re racist or not, you fucked up.

                • @lath
                  link
                  58 months ago

                  Have you heard of a saying? “Those looking for something will find it even where none exists.”

                  • @ganksy
                    link
                    28 months ago

                    Yes, it’s often true.

                    I will give you the author of the cartoon may not be racist. I can’t say. This particular embellishment was a mistake on their part. It watered down the potency of the comic for some and that makes it an oversight at best.

        • @Holyginz
          link
          228 months ago

          You immediately jumping to it being bigotry is the very thing Israel is doing right now claiming all criticism is bigotry. They both have stupid looking noses since its a sketched cartoon. Stop jumping to conclusions.

          • @feedum_sneedson
            link
            38 months ago

            Yeah but the artist is called Nasser. Sounds pretty antisemitic to me. I met a guy called Nasser once, guess what his surname was? That’s right, Hussein. What do you think he thought about Jews? I’ve no idea, he seemed like a decent guy though, so probably nothing awful. I’m assuming this Nasser Junior must be his son? He had a big nose too, come to think of it.

        • @Gabu
          link
          38 months ago

          Indeed, very deliberate – because it makes a fucking penis shape, you silly goose. Look at the positioning of the eyes.

          • @ganksy
            link
            -118 months ago

            Maybe. If I were to draw a comic about Japanese I’d be very careful about how I draw eyes and teeth because of how they were stereotyped in the past. If I drew one with black people I’d be sure it looked nothing like Pepe the frog. Lots of characters have the eyes outside the head style. Weiner face isn’t what I see here.

    • @glimse
      link
      598 months ago

      Come on, that’s just a cartoon nose. It’s not even close to the racist stereotype of Jewish noses.

      The Jewish nose, or the Jew’s nose, is an antisemitic ethnic stereotype referring to a hooked nose with a convex nasal bridge and a downward turn of the tip of the nose

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_nose

      • @kromem
        link
        English
        -48 months ago

        I didn’t think today I’d be looking at people arguing a Jew depicted with twice the size nose as the other character in the panel while speaking in broken English was going to be argued as not stereotypical because it isn’t hooked enough.

        Certainly didn’t think I’d see it as the upvoted opinion.

        Not at all like classic stereotypes or anything:

        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vw-g6JzHii8

        • @glimse
          link
          158 months ago

          Uhhh it’s a pretty huge difference. Nobody says Jews have long pointy noses like that.

          Go look at his other comics. You’ll find he’s drawn noses way more similar to the stereotype on brown people speaking arabic

    • @theluckyone
      link
      368 months ago

      Did you happen to notice the detached eye floating in mid air?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      68 months ago

      You’re right. They also didn’t use the Israeli flag, instead opting for just the Star of David.

      • @hark
        link
        188 months ago

        You might want to take a look at the israeli flag.

      • @Pilferjinx
        link
        138 months ago

        The flag is the star of David, no? I guess two bands of blue make a very subtle difference.

    • archomrade [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -68 months ago

      Honestly I think eye dialect is the real grotesque part of this.

      Most Israelis are native English speakers or were raised speaking English, there’s no reason to have used satirical grammar except to portray a gross ethnic stereotype.

      Not to mention that I think it undercuts the premise to make it about ethnicity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        68 months ago

        I’m sorry maybe I’m missing something, but how is it a stereotype to have the character speak like an idiot? The artist is trying to show that Israel in general is being idiotic, so this character speaking in a grammatically incorrect way matches that.

        • archomrade [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 months ago

          It isn’t just an idiotic way of speaking, they’re using eye dialect spelling to reproduce the guttural sound in traditional hebrew pronunciation (e.g. 'k-hamas), which is ethnically specific and a very common trope in antisemitic media. Modern Israelis typically have more in common with western english speakers (many don’t originate from Israel at all) than with this type of orthodox speech mannerisms.

          It would have been one thing to portray the figure as an idiot, but combining it with ethnically-charged tropes and signifiers starts making the comic less about the nature of what they’re doing (and the ridiculous logic they’re using to justify it) and more about what ethnic group the figure is a part of.

          It’s good practice to look critically at politically-charged comics for shorthands like the above.

          • @lath
            link
            18 months ago

            Have you considered perhaps the view of Zionists considering themselves as the only true representatives of their ethnicity?

            • archomrade [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -18 months ago

              Congratulations, you’ve broken my brain with this rationalization of antisemitism.

              ‘They consider themselves the only ‘real’ jews, so by being antisemitic i’m really just being anti-zionist’

              • @lath
                link
                28 months ago

                Have you considered perhaps the view that you might be an idiot? I do, and I accept that I lack understanding and that my knowledge is incomplete. You should try and do the same. It helps.

                Back on the topic. If Zionists consider themselves as the only true representatives of their ethnicity and thus separate themselves from the rest of their ethnicity, when someone else depicts that view, it is automatically anti-Semitic?

                So when Nazis separated themselves from the rest of the populace, only accepted the Aryan race as supreme and started genociding those they considered inferior, people who depicted them as such were actually anti-germanic.

                I hope your brain doesn’t hurt now that it’s broken.

                • archomrade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  08 months ago

                  If Zionists consider themselves as the only true representatives of their ethnicity and thus separate themselves from the rest of their ethnicity, when someone else depicts that view, it is automatically anti-Semitic?

                  Lol, you’re really doubling down on this? By your logic, does depicting a jew with a hooked nose classify as antisemitic? Since they say they’re the ‘true jews’, are any of the classic jewish stereotypes fair game?

                  The problem with their use isn’t that you’re projecting a classification on them, it’s that you’re tying their differentiating characteristics to the terrible thing they’ve done. You’re making it (to varying degrees) about what makes them jewish, not the terrible thing they’re doing.

                  I’ve heard a lot of rationalizations of racism before, but “i’m actually doing activism” is a new one.

                  • @lath
                    link
                    28 months ago

                    Who’s talking about noses? This was about a manner of speech.