• @ajoebyanyothername
    link
    English
    72 months ago

    He mentioned three years of support in the video, but not sure if that’s to fully end of support or just system updates.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        4 years of security on a mid-range phone is okay, Bare minimum but it wouldn’t put me off buying one.

      • setVeryLoud(true);
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        That’s a nah from me. Beat Google / Apple at support or I’m not considering the product.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          It costs less than any of Apple or Google’s offerings and they do not make money through software and services unlike Apple or Google. I think it’s unreasonable to expect 7 years or more of OS updates on a phone that costs $300-400. They should do better on their flagship though, it costs double but still has the same support.

          • setVeryLoud(true);
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            It’s still hardware in the trash in 4 years, regardless of cost to the end user. I intend to keep my Pixel 6 until it dies or runs out of security updates in 3 years, whichever comes first.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              I don’t know if the hardware will be good enough in 4 years anyways. They’ve cut corners to get to that price point, the chip is similar to the 778G from 3 years back and it’s using UFS 2.2. Honestly the phone feels like it was made for India and the marketing indicates that. They don’t have many options with a clean OS and 3 years of OS updates at that price point there.

              • setVeryLoud(true);
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 months ago

                I don’t see why cheaper hardware would have to last less long, or even if it should, from an ethical and e-waste standpoint.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  It might not be powerful enough to run the software longer and the hardware may show it’s age. Secondly the cost of the phone cannot be ignored either, more software updates means more money spent on software development. Android updates have to be certified by Google. This process costs money. It isn’t feasible to expect a company to provide more than 4-5 years of updates at that price point unless they start charging for updates or make money through services or ads.

                  • setVeryLoud(true);
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    2
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    I guess that’s fair, it’s wishful thinking on my part that mobile computing could be like laptops or desktops. I still personally wouldn’t get a device without a long update guarantee, you get better bang for your buck even with a pricier device since you’re keeping it longer and it’s better for the environment.

                  • @Melonpoly
                    link
                    English
                    12 months ago

                    If it’s still capable of providing a smooth experience after three years, I doubt it’ll suddenly start struggling after 4 more. It’s not like day-to-day apps require more powerful hardware every 3 years.