• @Wogi
    link
    59 months ago

    UBI is a bandaid, and not a very good one.

    Sure, having more money absolutely makes life easier. I’m not disputing that and no one with any sense would. But it doesn’t address the numerous problems it seeks to.

    But you touched on the problem, adequate controls are needed. We can do adequate controls without UBI.

    The problem with UBI is that when you do big payouts like that, they just become a target for price gouging. Everyone knows there’s extra money to be had and they’re going to want their cut. Your landlord is going to know exactly how much extra you’re making and without rent control there’s nothing stopping him from taking it. The best way to prevent that is to force him to compete for tenants.

    So wait, why isn’t he competing for tenants now?

    Additional housing fixes the rent problem. UBI puts a temporary bandaid on it.

    Universal healthcare fixes the medical expenses problem, strong unionization fixes the wages problem.

    Don’t get me wrong I’d love the paycheck, but it isn’t the solution people think it is.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      49 months ago

      The problem with UBI is that when you do big payouts like that, they just become a target for price gouging.

      If you have robust laws preventing price gouging, that is not a problem. No one serious is suggesting implementing UBI with no framework around it.

      Incidentally, Alaska has a universal basic income in the form of oil dividends every year and there’s no evidence it’s led to price gouging as far as I know.

      • @Wogi
        link
        39 months ago

        A few thousand dollars a year is an order of magnitude different than a few thousand dollars a month. Shits already expensive in Alaska because it’s remote.

        Incidentally a handful of studies are several orders of magnitude different than actual UBI, and would similarly fail to showcase the problem.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          19 months ago

          Again- if you have robust laws against price gouging, there is no price gouging problem.

          • @Wogi
            link
            39 months ago

            Robust laws also prevent the need for UBI in the first place. If we can’t figure out how to run a society without it, slapping UBI on top of that isn’t actually going to fix anything.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              19 months ago

              You’re making no sense. How is giving everyone the financial help to keep them clothed, housed, fed, etc. without needing to work for it not going to fix anything as long as you prevent price gouging?

              • @Wogi
                link
                19 months ago

                Ok, let me recontextualize here. “if we can terraform mars, why wouldn’t we migrate because of climate change on earth?” In that scenario, why wouldn’t we fix our climate?

                If we have the power to regulate pricing, why would we need UBI?

                It’s socialism with extra steps. You can just do regular socialism, you don’t need to enshitify socialism with capitalism. You really don’t.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  -19 months ago

                  If we have the power to regulate pricing, why would we need UBI?

                  Because no matter how low priced something is, someone who has no job still can’t afford it.

                  • @Wogi
                    link
                    29 months ago

                    So, provide the necessary things. Provide housing, medical care, and clothing to anyone that wants it, doing so will probably be necessary for price controls anyway. I’m not saying those things should be unobtainable. I’m saying UBI is a dumb way to go about providing them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Universal Basic Income reduced child poverty by 30%.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_tax_credit#United_States

      By making the child tax credit non-refundable it is effectively a Negative Income Tax which is a form of UBI.

      ‘Additional housing fixes the rent problem. UBI puts a temporary bandaid on it. Universal healthcare fixes the medical expenses problem, strong unionization fixes the wages problem. Don’t get me wrong I’d love the paycheck, but it isn’t the solution people think it is.’

      All of your points misunderstand what the goal of UBI is. By guaranteeing that everyone earns a certain amount of income, the government is garaunteeing a basic standard of living. So a CTC of $3600 means that everyone is guaranteeed an income of at least $3600.

      At first, there will be an inital raise in prices as a UBI will likely increases aggregate demand which will increase prices, but eventually prices would stabilize.

      Of course, this only helps people with children right now, and there are barriers to filing a tax return in the United States. But the laws could be change to expand the credit, and it’s completely possible for the United States to implement return free filing.