Who would have thought this would have happened?

  • NeuromancerOPM
    link
    fedilink
    -128 months ago

    You’re licking boots.

    The people were living on their current wage. They were happy with their wage. It’s in the article.

    Now they have no job and no wages. Now they are sad.

    Their wage was liveable to them. Now it’s not. The market was working fine until the government got in the middle and took away their jobs.

    • @BunkerBuster
      link
      9
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “He did blame it on the minimum wage increase. Although, from my understanding, I think we were exempt from it because of the amount of locations that he personally owns. But, he did ultimately blame it on that increase,” she said.

      How about this for a new title: “Salty Restaurant owner doesn’t like new law that doesn’t apply to him, fires everyone anyway”

      Gotta love the free market, right?

      You’re licking corporate boot to defend shitty business practices.

      • NeuromancerOPM
        link
        fedilink
        -108 months ago

        The law does apply to him. She’s incorrect.

        A better title would be California governor causes mass layoffs.

        The owner has no obligation to provide jobs. If the risk isn’t worth the reward, he’ll shut down. That’s how it works.

            • Zeppo
              link
              fedilink
              07 months ago

              The law says it only applies to businesses that have over 60 locations nationwide. Back in real life and not “woah conservative bro I’m so traumatized” world, Fosters Freeze has 62 locations. So to avoid this law, they’d have to close 3 of them. Also not sure whether it applies to franchisees, and I’m sure you have absolutely no idea either.

              • NeuromancerOPM
                link
                fedilink
                -37 months ago

                Yes it applies to franchises. So you think foster should close two and move grow again ?

                • Zeppo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  27 months ago

                  No, I think they should figure out how to be profitable enough to pay their employees enough to live on in California. Not sure why that’s a difficult concept.

                  • NeuromancerOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -47 months ago

                    They already pay them enough. 20 isn’t some Magic number. It’s a number the government made up with no logic.

                    Since inflation has lowered sales. It means fewer jobs for people who will have a hard time getting a job. Way to go California.

                    The employees said they were happy with their pay. They’d rather have 16 an hour than no job.