Regarding the post title’s question, I don’t know. While I enjoy immensely watching movies on “the big screen,” I don’t know if I like them more just because of that. With cinema, the bigger the viewing area the better.
Regarding the article’s opening Does Avatar Matter?, the reason Avatar left no “cultural footprint” is because it is pure fluff, as substantial as cotton candy. Without the giant screen and the 3D, the film is nothing. I loved it—well, the first half of it anyway, before it turned into a pedestrian fairy tale complete with comic-book evil soldier-guy. So much spectacle for so little substance. Did anyone see it in standard 2D?
I saw and enjoyed the second one too…in 3D of course. Couldn’t even tell you the title. This one was mostly in or under water instead of a jungle, complete with another comic-book bad guy.
Regarding the post title’s question, I don’t know. While I enjoy immensely watching movies on “the big screen,” I don’t know if I like them more just because of that. With cinema, the bigger the viewing area the better.
Regarding the article’s opening Does Avatar Matter?, the reason Avatar left no “cultural footprint” is because it is pure fluff, as substantial as cotton candy. Without the giant screen and the 3D, the film is nothing. I loved it—well, the first half of it anyway, before it turned into a pedestrian fairy tale complete with comic-book evil soldier-guy. So much spectacle for so little substance. Did anyone see it in standard 2D?
I saw and enjoyed the second one too…in 3D of course. Couldn’t even tell you the title. This one was mostly in or under water instead of a jungle, complete with another comic-book bad guy.
[email protected] ☆ [email protected] ☆ [email protected]