• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    68 months ago

    LLMs analyse their inputs and create a stochastic model (i.e.: a guess of how randomness is distributed in a domain) of which word comes next.

    Yes, it can help in a creative process, but so can literal noise. It can’t “be creative” in itself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      How that preclude these models from being creative? Randomness within rules can be pretty creative. All life on earth is the result of selection on random mutations. Its output is way more structured and coherent than random noise. That’s not a good comparison at all.

      Either way, generative tools are a great way for the people using to create with, no model has to be creative on its own.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        How that preclude these models from being creative?

        They lack intentionality, simple as that.

        Either way, generative tools are a great way for the people using to create with, no model has to be creative on its own.

        Yup, my original point still stands.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            48 months ago

            Are you serious?

            Intentionality is integral to communication. Creative art is a subset of communication.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              38 months ago

              I was asking about creativity, not art. It’s possible for something to be creative and not be art.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  28 months ago

                  I don’t think all creativity requires intentionality. Some forms of creativity are the accumulation of unintentional outcomes, like when someone sets out to copy a thing, but due to mistakes or other factors outside their control end up with something unique to what they were going for.