@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 8 months agoHilariouslemmy.mlimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1920arrow-down131file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1889arrow-down1imageHilariouslemmy.ml@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square25fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink64•8 months agoPoint four was the first thing I immediately noticed.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink22•8 months agoNo, they explicitely demanded the 100 times after the say-i-am-sorry-once-routine terminated
minus-squareSolivinelinkfedilink18•8 months agoIt wasn’t explicit! What if the amount of sorries is stored in a global state? She didn’t necessarily specify 100 more sorries. Women so confusing smh.
Point four was the first thing I immediately noticed.
Technically 102 if you include the one already said
No, they explicitely demanded the 100 times after the say-i-am-sorry-once-routine terminated
It wasn’t explicit! What if the amount of sorries is stored in a global state? She didn’t necessarily specify 100 more sorries. Women so confusing smh.
forever scarred by OBO errors… I noticed that too