The reposts and expressions of shock from public figures followed quickly after a user on the social platform X who uses a pseudonym claimed that a government website had revealed “skyrocketing” rates of voters registering without a photo ID in three states this year — two of them crucial to the presidential contest.

“Extremely concerning,” X owner Elon Musk replied twice to the post this past week.

“Are migrants registering to vote using SSN?” Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, an ally of former President Donald Trump, asked on Instagram, using the acronym for Social Security number.

Trump himself posted to his own social platform within hours to ask, “Who are all those voters registering without a Photo ID in Texas, Pennsylvania, and Arizona??? What is going on???”

Yet by the time they tried to correct the record, the false claim had spread widely. In three days, the pseudonymous user’s claim amassed more than 63 million views on X, according to the platform’s metrics. A thorough explanation from Richer attracted a fraction of that, reaching 2.4 million users.

The incident sheds light on how social media accounts that shield the identities of the people or groups behind them through clever slogans and cartoon avatars have come to dominate right-wing political discussion online even as they spread false information.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    49 months ago

    Telling people they are over reacting to death threats is a take…

    It is “easy” to have a single Identity system, but that doesn’t address the criticism of it being difficult to secure. But either way, it seems Florida has volunteered for this experiment with the age restriction for social media.

    • Dark Arc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Telling people they are over reacting to death threats is a take…

      That’s a gross oversimplification of my comment, by a brand new account too, very cool.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It’s a charitable simplification too. I’m not the one that emphasized that not every LGBTQ person is going to be hunted.

        • Dark Arc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Because it’s absurd to say that nobody would be harmed; speaking in absolutes is the antithetical of intelligent discussion for complex issues.

          How many LGBTQ people were killed because Trump and all the faux Trump supporting accounts weren’t stopped in 2016? How many more will be killed if this problem of bot accounts, nation state actors, and people making threats with 0 accountability isn’t solved and disinformation and extremism spreads further?