- cross-posted to:
- politics
- nottheonion
- cross-posted to:
- politics
- nottheonion
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13942559
(water is wet and fire is hot).
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13942559
(water is wet and fire is hot).
I’d argue it depends on context. When it comes to corporate budgeting, ‘resource’ is appropriate, as it could be a contracted company, a tool, or an individual. When it comes to actual manpower, I think referring by title is reasonable.
But in the context of hiring and HR, “resource” is the only term they understand, especially if there is trouble making the ROI clear