To clarify : “strength of character”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This is a very vague and open-ended question. Keep thinking on it and ask a more specific question to get better answers.

    Masculine is the word you’re looking for. It’s all the same, really, just less precise. Out of biological necessity, women and men evolved different ways of handling situations. There will never be a stereotype or trait that applies to every individual of a large group, but if I ask you which is more likely to get into a bar fight, it’s clear the scale tips in one direction or the other.

    But regarding the movie question, no. It’s cheap to make a woman physically beefy to give the idea that she’s strong. There are many examples where the woman hero character is not beefy strongwoman. Movies where sword skill or martial arts are employed. There are characters of women who are strong because of their intelligence, always being one step ahead. Women characters who use their cunning wit and charm to con people. Women characters who use their compassion and stoic nature to unite opposing groups to fight a larger enemy.

    You see big = strong more often because it’s an easy trope. You wouldn’t expect to see a movie with some lanky spaghetti armed guy kicking ass all day. At most he’d usually be the hacker sidekick for comedic effect.

    The discussion around gender stereotypes, no matter how accurate, will always be a landmine, so be warned.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      -78 months ago

      Yes yes.

      On a tangential note, I just had a post removed from nostupidquestions. My post about the degradation of knowledge.

      Apparently lemmy mods have recently been given the power of shadow-removal (the power to temove while keeping you in the dark about the fact), which is nice.

      When everybody you talk to is dumb as a rock. When the people in charge have the integrity of jello. What then? Is it worthwhile sifting cesspools for specks of intelligent conversation then?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        It’s not a now thing. The masses have always been collectively dumb. There are some individuals who are intelligent, and they tend to form groups or colleges so they can be around similarly minded individuals.

        Lemmy is not a good place for nuanced or intelligent discussion. Neither is reddit. For that, I suggest seeking out a philosophy forum, but then you’ll likely feel like you’re the common idiot… speaking from experience.

        • @Krudler
          link
          English
          47 months ago

          You are being trolled, this person made a humongous ruckus and pissed everybody off, and insulted everybody, and is acting like he has no idea what’s going on.

          If anybody was a candidate to be permanently nuked from the internet, it’s people like the guy you’re responding to.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            I figured, but checking post history gave doubts. I’m seeing this kind of stuff everywhere on reddit and Lemmy… dumb questions almost so stupid and ‘triggering’ it’s like they’re designed to make people upset and nothing else.

            • @Krudler
              link
              English
              37 months ago

              It’s more sinister than that, not only did this person go out of their way to be a complete jerk, they spent the whole evening editing their posts and replies, just to provoke conflict.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                37 months ago

                more sinister than that

                That’s what I’m thinking too. It’s part of the common trend I’m seeing here and on reddit. Posting for no reason other than to get people into a pissed off state of mind, and it’s not funny trolling by any means.