Unlike the other two which are clear violations of embassy sovereignty, cutting off external resources doesn’t seem like a violation to me. Argentina could just buy gas and run generators.
I agree it’s not as serious as the other two but I still see it as a petty punitive measure that does nothing to help resolve anything. Personally, I feel access to utilities should fall under an embassy’s protection as it’s not really logistically feasible for an embassy to provide their own utilities.
Unlike the other two which are clear violations of embassy sovereignty, cutting off external resources doesn’t seem like a violation to me. Argentina could just buy gas and run generators.
I agree it’s not as serious as the other two but I still see it as a petty punitive measure that does nothing to help resolve anything. Personally, I feel access to utilities should fall under an embassy’s protection as it’s not really logistically feasible for an embassy to provide their own utilities.