oof / womp womp

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    English
    43 months ago

    You seem like you enjoy research, you should go look up how causes of death are determined, and how vaccine efficacy is calculated. We’ve had this stuff figured out for over a hundred years now. Going backwards is not only unnecessary, it’s foolish, and destructive.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -73 months ago

      Have you done research on this? Sanitation was thought to do more to prevent disease than vaccines:

      Vaccines get all the glory, but most plumbers will tell you that it was water infrastructure – sewage systems and clean water – that eradicated disease, and they’re right.

      http://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com/how-plumbing-not-vaccines-eradicated-disease

      The questionable experimental “covid vax” fanned the flames of skepticism towards all vaccines

      Prior to “covid”, it was reported the flu shot was the least effective in recent years

      We could circle back to a lot of proven medical actions. A lot of deaths attributed to “covid” were with people who had additional issues like obesity, were smoking, or elderly, vitamin D deficient. So get people to lose weight and make sure they have vitamin D and quarantine the elderly. Many actionable items that were conveniently ignored, since they could make lots of money pushing a “vaccine” to swindle the population out of money. That is another thing, how the “vaccine” was paid for by tax dollars, rather than the people who wanted them. Problem after problem…

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        If you knew for certain that you were going to die, but hopping on one foot would give you a 60% chance to live, would you do it? Now what if rubbing your belly gave you a 30% chance to live, and patting your head gave you 10% chance? But if you do all 3 you have a 100% chance to live. Would you only hop on one foot since that’s the most effective? No, you would do all 3, combining the methods for maximum effectiveness. Your argument is no different, except you’re saying in this non-hypothetical situation you’re only going to do one thing.