The problem is airplanes have very strict procedures to keep the industry safe. When procedures aren’t followed, something is going wrong. While powder and vaseline might not be dangerous, they are an obvious indication of a company not following their own policies nor aviation regulation.
Do you think it should be viewed as a problem when a company starts cutting corners and ALREADY HAS gotten hundreds killed for it?
If it works, nobody gets hurt, and it doesn’t damage anything, then it should be fine.
The problem is airplanes have very strict procedures to keep the industry safe. When procedures aren’t followed, something is going wrong. While powder and vaseline might not be dangerous, they are an obvious indication of a company not following their own policies nor aviation regulation.
Do you think it should be viewed as a problem when a company starts cutting corners and ALREADY HAS gotten hundreds killed for it?
It’s kinda like the Van Halen brown M&M thing. It’s not about the M&Ms. It’s about whether or not you can follow directions.
Boeing approved its use though.
Like I said: A sign of a company cutting corners. In an industry where nobody but share holders want corners cut.
So what exactly are you suggesting they use instead? Its on the approved list. Why not use something on the approved list?