- cross-posted to:
- politics
- cross-posted to:
- politics
Greased by lobbying and campaign cash, tax breaks for retirement savings are one thing Congress agrees on. But they also blow out the deficit and add to income inequality.
Five months before Congress faced a near-catastrophic standoff over the debt ceiling, with Republicans demanding restrictions to food and Medicaid programs to rein in spending, a bill that raised the cost of private retirement savings accounts to $282 billion per year was quietly signed into law.
In this era of deeply divided politics, the 2022 bill known as Secure 2.0 was hailed as a bipartisan success — a victory for average Americans. It had sailed through the House by a whopping 414-5 vote. It followed four other major bills passed between 1996 and 2019 that dramatically expanded taxpayer savings – all equally lauded as bipartisan victories.
But that rare issue that brought a divided Washington together also increased wealth disparities and the federal deficit. And the victory was most strongly applauded by the burgeoning financial services industry, for whom tax-advantaged retirement savings has transformed a $7 trillion retirement market in 1995 to a $38.4 trillion behemoth in 2023.
Here is what is happening in my head.
You said:
I agree. But I don’t have a young child anyway.
That was not the conversation we had.
I hope this clears things up.
You should probably go up top there and change where you said “I just had this conversation with my daughter yesterday”…
I did not say that. That is false. This is what I said and this is it in context:
In other words, I was talking to my daughter about people who think you should invest money rather than buy groceries.
Once again, I hope this clears things up.
Not even a little 😕 Who exactly is telling you to invest your money instead of buying groceries?
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/may/15/australian-millionaire-millennials-avocado-toast-house