• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    47 months ago

    some_guy is stating that he was excluding high risk recipients in order to juice his own success rates (simpler patients means better outcomes)

    • @DODOKING38
      link
      27 months ago

      Is that a bad thing? Like If you had a choice between 2 patients but one had a higher chance, which would you choose?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        Yes; it’s bad because it’s dishonest.

        It’s not about which specific rules they follow: it’s about the importance of WHATEVER rules are chosen, and the whole community following them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -17 months ago

        Yeah that how it should work but he was probably putting poors ahead of the rich which is a big no-no its today’s capatalist America.

        Rich get good treatment, the poors get to fight for scraps.