It is a scenario playing out nationwide. From Oregon to Pennsylvania, hundreds of communities have in recent years either stopped adding fluoride to their water supplies or voted to prevent its addition. Supporters of such bans argue that people should be given the freedom of choice. The broad availability of over-the-counter dental products containing the mineral makes it no longer necessary to add to public water supplies, they say. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that while store-bought products reduce tooth decay, the greatest protection comes when they are used in combination with water fluoridation.

The outcome of an ongoing federal case in California could force the Environmental Protection Agency to create a rule regulating or banning the use of fluoride in drinking water nationwide. In the meantime, the trend is raising alarm bells for public health researchers who worry that, much like vaccines, fluoride may have become a victim of its own success.

The CDC maintains that community water fluoridation is not only safe and effective but also yields significant cost savings in dental treatment. Public health officials say removing fluoride could be particularly harmful to low-income families — for whom drinking water may be the only source of preventive dental care.

“If you have to go out and get care on your own, it’s a whole different ballgame,” said Myron Allukian Jr., a dentist and past president of the American Public Health Association. Millions of people have lived with fluoridated water for years, “and we’ve had no major health problems,” he said. “It’s much easier to prevent a disease than to treat it.”

According to the anti-fluoride group Fluoride Action Network, since 2010, over 240 communities around the world have removed fluoride from their drinking water or decided not to add it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -148 months ago

    What a bad faith argument.

    Most people who want to avoid fluoride in their drinking water use reverse osmosis.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      148 months ago

      Then I guess there’s a solution and we don’t need to remove it for everyone else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -15
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Why should people have to resort to using reverse osmosis to avoid fluoride in their drinking water?

        Also, good job pivoting instead of admitting you were arguing in bad faith.

        I expect you to keep doing that.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          108 months ago

          For the same reason people should “have to” resort to anything else they don’t want that everyone else is fine with. You don’t get to choose for society as a whole.

          If you don’t want to eat inspected meat, fine. Go raise or hunt your own.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -118 months ago

            For the same reason people should “have to” resort to anything else they don’t want that everyone else is fine with.

            Like lead in gasoline? The thing is, everyone else is not “fine” with this. Why do you think there’s an article about it?

            • @T00l_shed
              link
              98 months ago

              Complains about people arguing in bad faith, proceeds to argue in bad faith. Hahahahahaha

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -108 months ago

                Can you stop replying to all my posts?

                We’ve already established you can’t read.

                In fact, I’m just gonna make the proactive decision to block you. Goodbye.

        • @T00l_shed
          link
          78 months ago

          Why should people have to suffer at the hands of idiots who want to ban fluoride in water?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -12
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            That’s a loaded question because people do not suffer without fluoridated water.

            Do you want to explain how they suffer without fluoridated water? That way you’re talking specifics that can actually be debated upon instead of generalities where people need to make your arguments for you.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -128 months ago

                The addition of fluoride (fluoridation) to drinking water that is low in fluoride or the use of fluoride toothpaste and supplements significantly reduces the risk of tooth decay.

                Jeez, you really can’t read, can you?

                I don’t expect you to be capable of making worthwhile arguments, so I’m just going to end this here.

                Goodbye.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  118 months ago

                  The point is that there are people that cannot regularly afford fluoridated toothpaste or for some other legitimate reason cannot brush their teeth as often as is recommended. Fluoridated water is the best and only dental care many Americans get, and it doesn’t carry any harms that are even meaningfully measurable.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -108 months ago

                    What? We put fluoride in water because people can’t afford toothpaste or brush their teeth? That’s news to me.

                    So you’re saying that there’s no point in having fluoridated water if you have proper dental hygiene?

                • @T00l_shed
                  link
                  78 months ago

                  No I can read, and I can infer. A useful skill.

        • @irreticent
          link
          78 months ago

          you were arguing in bad faith

          Or perhaps they were making a joke.