Mehr Sicherheit an Axenstrasse  – Nach Axenstrasse-Unfall: Zusätzliche Leitplanken, Tempo wird reduziert
www.tagesanzeiger.ch
Vor einem Jahr war beim Wolfsprung zwischen Brunnen und Sisikon ein Auto in den Vierwaldstättersee gestürzt. Jetzt reagiert der Bund.

https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/zusaetzliche-leitplanken-sollen-sturz-in-den-see-verhindern-889109411901

Sorry I couldn’t find an article on this in English, but to summarise: there was a bad crash on this rather dangerous road, and the response from the federal roads office, along with lowing the speed limit slightly and adding barriers, is to ban bikes from riding here.

For some context, this road is on the edge of a lake, with mountains on the other side. There is no reasonable alternative for cyclists. Whereas for drivers using this as a through-route (it is part of a major north-south access), there is a large tunnelled motorway on the other side of the lake that would be a minor detour for most. This is all while another road is being constructed to parallel this one at the cost of CHF 1.2 Billion, to be completed in 2033.

They are nice enough to offer an hourly shuttle for up to 16 cyclists at a time.

I think it’s absurd that cyclists again get the short end of the stick when one driver is unable to control their vehicle (with no cyclists involved). And the speed limit is kept as high as 60km/h when clearly the road should be for local use only where a much lower limit would make sense, and longer distance traffic rerouted to the other side of the lake (which is an extra 10km if you’re heading further south from Zurich for example).

  • @[email protected]
    4•1 year ago

    This road is definitely a problem, it is the only stretch of the main north/south highway that isn’t actually a highway, once they build that tunnel it can finally serve the purpose of a local alternative for vehicles that can’t go on the highway (bikes and tractors and other slow stuff).

    The only way you could improve the current situation is by offering free bike-tickets on the trains running between the two closest stations instead of this weird shuttle.

    • @[email protected]OP
      2•1 year ago

      There already is a highway on the other side of the lake. It’s only 10km extra if you’re doing Zurich -> Lugano for example. There’s no need for another road tunnel.

      • @[email protected]
        1•1 year ago

        From Zurich yeah, but from the east of Zurich the deveation gets much longer. And there is a highway on both the north and the south of the Axenstrasse, so this tunnel makes sense and as you see is needed to use this road as a local connector.

        And I don’t think this would lead to that many more cars on the road, because the limiting factor will still be the Gotthard.

        • @[email protected]OP
          1•1 year ago

          There’s a lot more people to the west of Zurich than the east, and for many in the east it is faster to take the San Bernadino pass anyway.

          Just because there’s already highways there, doesn’t mean we have to build more, we could just accept that it has already been overbuilt and stop.

          The Gotthard is currently being doubled, and both should be open around the same time as this new stretch. These combined will lead to more traffic.