China’s Xi Jinping says ‘no force’ can stop ‘reunion’ with Taiwan - National | Globalnews.ca
globalnews.ca
China's Xi Jinping spoke of a ‘family reunion’ with Taiwan when he met with a former Taiwanese president. Beijing has threatened to use force to reabsorb the democracy.

Amid heightened tensions between China and Taiwan, Chinese President Xi Jinping told a former Taiwanese president who supports unification that the countries “belong” together.

“Differences in systems cannot change the fact that both sides of the Taiwan Straits belong to the same country and nation,” Xi said.

“External interference cannot stop the historical trend of reunion of the country and family,” Xi said, in comments reported by Taiwanese media and published by Reuters.

…

Beijing claims the independent island of Taiwan is a Chinese province and has threatened to use force to achieve unification. China frequently sends warplanes and naval vessels to circle the small island democracy and has been mounting an increasing number of military drills over recent years.

  • @solomon42069English
    4•7 months ago

    He’s technically correct - the Taiwanese government are the legitimate government of China living in exile from the Communist Party’s violent take over.

    • @[email protected]English
      19•7 months ago

      This is a wild take. The Chiang Kai-shek’s KMT did not have any more legitimacy than the CPC. He was a straight up fascist and after fleeing to Taiwan he politically repressed native Taiwanese people by having them massacred. You can oppose Xi and the CPC without having to pretend the KMT was at all legitimate.

      • @wabafeeEnglish
        8•7 months ago

        Both are violent. Just happened that the first one matured into a democracy while the second into a dictatorship.

          • @wabafeeEnglish
            1•7 months ago

            Curious what you think they are?

              • @wabafeeEnglish
                1•7 months ago

                Yep those two are democractic nations though Singapore is almost by name but seem to be improving.

                • @[email protected]English
                  1•7 months ago

                  But the same party has ruled over them each since the inception. From my perspective, that is democracy only in name.

                  • @wabafeeEnglish
                    1•7 months ago

                    Which are you talking about?

              • @[email protected]English
                3•7 months ago

                Well, Hawaii didn’t get statehood until 1959. As a matter of fact, Hawaii wasn’t even Annexed until The Confederacy was dissolved. But I get what you mean.

                Let’s say they did go there and started a new country on their own. The United States doesn’t own that government.