001100 010010 to [email protected]English • edit-21 year agoIt's Open Source!lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square216fedilinkarrow-up11.82Karrow-down1139file-text
arrow-up11.68Karrow-down1imageIt's Open Source!lemmy.dbzer0.com001100 010010 to [email protected]English • edit-21 year agomessage-square216fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCyclohexaneMlinkfedilinkEnglish8•1 year agoAlthough this is fair, those contributors were from a research group from a prestigious university. That makes them much more trustworthy by default, and its natural that a code reviewer will give them more benefit of doubt.
minus-squareDioxylinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoI remember this, wasn’t this a complete shitshow in the news?
Although this is fair, those contributors were from a research group from a prestigious university. That makes them much more trustworthy by default, and its natural that a code reviewer will give them more benefit of doubt.
I remember this, wasn’t this a complete shitshow in the news?