NeuromancerM to [email protected] • 8 months agoSan Francisco bill would let people sue grocery stores for closing too quicklyreason.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down136
arrow-up1-27arrow-down1external-linkSan Francisco bill would let people sue grocery stores for closing too quicklyreason.comNeuromancerM to [email protected] • 8 months agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-4•8 months ago They aren’t even being told to pay for it, just provide 6 months notice before closing! Find another grocery store, created a co-op etc. none of these are their obligations. I suspect this will get thrown out if passed
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-4•edit-28 months agoNo the bill has other restrictions as well. It’s in the article. And who’s enraged? I just think it’s stupid.
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-4•8 months agoSection 5703 just as I described. That’s the governments job. Not the job of the business.
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-5•8 months agoJust the fact they have to do it is funding It. Labor isn’t free. Why is it lefties like fascist law? Not trolling, genuinely curious.
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-4•8 months agoIf the city didn’t allow crime on the level to force the business out, the business would not leave. It is weird you blame the corporation for not wanting their employees to be harmed at work. Yes, it is authoritarian to force a company to do the job the government should be doing. This would never hold up in court.
Find another grocery store, created a co-op etc. none of these are their obligations. I suspect this will get thrown out if passed
deleted by creator
No the bill has other restrictions as well. It’s in the article.
And who’s enraged? I just think it’s stupid.
deleted by creator
Section 5703 just as I described. That’s the governments job. Not the job of the business.
deleted by creator
Just the fact they have to do it is funding It. Labor isn’t free. Why is it lefties like fascist law? Not trolling, genuinely curious.
deleted by creator
If the city didn’t allow crime on the level to force the business out, the business would not leave.
It is weird you blame the corporation for not wanting their employees to be harmed at work.
Yes, it is authoritarian to force a company to do the job the government should be doing. This would never hold up in court.