• @DillyDaily
    link
    47 months ago

    IRL subtitles for deaf attendees feels like the only valid reason for this.

    • @dejected_warp_core
      link
      27 months ago

      Honestly, a deaf audience would overwhelmingly prefer to read the document themselves. Otherwise, you’re just sitting there spending seconds reading the slide, then minutes of lip-flapping while they wait for the hearing world to catch up. For each slide.

      • @DillyDaily
        link
        17 months ago

        Yes and no, live captioning software is common on phones and tablets, but we call them “craptions” for a reason.

        If the speaker has a thick accent, isn’t always facing the same direction when speaking, uses lots of slang terms, industry terms, or numerical data, it can really trip up the captions and sometimes it leads to a more confusion than having nothing at all.

        Where as if you were basically just using the PowerPoint to display your speech so others could read along, the written words will match the spoken words.

        Live captions are definitely better than nothing if you rely on subtitles, I’m only HoH so I prefer just straight up lipreading, compared to trying to lip read in order to retroactively process inaccurate live captions that make no sense.