• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 months ago

    Actually, there seems to be a bit of a mix-up. Let me clarify.

    In an anarchist group, enforcing anything goes against its fundamental principles.

    If personal gain is the motive, one isn’t truly aligned with the group’s social contract and isn’t considered part of it.

    Decisions are made collectively, without hierarchy. Voting or delegating organisational tasks to sub-groups is the norm.

    I won’t go into words like “attacking,” “defense,” or “threats” as they are military terms, far from the anarchist ethos.

    And I won’t call you “bro” or make you read theory. I feel you won’t.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      So then Anarchy is completely defenseless to both internal and external strife, doomed to collapse in every circumstance.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        Why defenseless? The entire organization can defense itself from outsiders. No need of hierarchy for that.