• 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
    link
    English
    -18 months ago

    Bud…yes, similar policies against any other racial group as practiced in South Africa.

    When a court of law with competent jurisdiction somewhere find someone outside of South Africa guilty of apartheid, then you have a leg to stand. Until then, there’s a reason nobody has been charged outside of South Africa, and that’s because the practices in South Africa were if a fundamentally different character than those in Israel, chiefly, based on immigration status, not race, and secondly, against non citizens, not citizens.

    • ???
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I thought there was hope for you. But today I’m convinced that either (1) you’re a hopeless pro-zioniat bootlicker or (2) you have some kind of psychological issue that makes you incapable of changing your mind even when provided with overwhelming evidence.

      And today is the day I stop giving a fuck. I’m blocking you soon, goodbye forever. May we never meet. I don’t need more assholes to dehumanize me as a Palestinian and deny me the right to self determination and self defense in favor of a bunch of ruthless butchers.

      Ps: frankly you seem quite racist. The slimy questionable lawer-type racist.

    • @OccamsTeapot
      link
      English
      18 months ago

      Bud…yes, similar policies against any other racial group as practiced in South Africa.

      So not necessarily a minority vs a majority. It literally doesn’t matter and appears nowhere in the definition.

      When a court of law with competent jurisdiction somewhere find someone outside of South Africa guilty of apartheid, then you have a leg to stand

      The implicit idea that we can’t just read the definition and apply it, so we must wait for a court to read it for us is laughable to me. Crimes exist regardless of whether they are convicted in practice.