A judge ordered Planned Parenthood to hand records of transgender care over to Andrew Bailey.

A St. Louis judge has ruled that Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is entitled to Planned Parenthood’s transgender care records, ordering the nonprofit to turn over some of its most sensitive files to the man who has built his unelected political career on restricting health care access for trans people.

In his Thursday decision, Circuit Judge Michael Stelzer wrote that Bailey can collect documents under Missouri’s consumer protection statute that aren’t protected under federal mandate, namely the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, better known as HIPAA.

“It is clear from the statute that the Defendant has the broad investigative powers when the consumer is in possible need of protection and there is no dispute in this matter,” wrote Stelzer. “Therefore, the Defendant is entitled to some of the requested documents within his [Civil Investigative Demand].”

Bailey, who last year attempted to implement a ban on gender-affirming care for people of all ages, was quick to celebrate the decision, calling it a “big day” for the state.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Hey I’m going to help you with that link real quick. The rates of desistance from kids that have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria is very very low. Kids that are not diagnosed with gender dysphoria are not receiving gender affirming care.

    The desistance rates for kids that self-identified as trans are very high. But those kids aren’t getting gender-affirming care. It takes a medical diagnosis. And when there is a medical diagnosis the rates of desistance are very very low.

    Now do you have actual evidence that surgeries are happening on minors?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -27 months ago

      But those kids aren’t getting gender-affirming care.

      How do you know? There are stories where kids do one appointment with a doctor and are diagnosed. You are making claims that are not provable. I am good at math and i can tell you that if the majority of kids that think they are trans later desist then a good sized portion of them are getting meds. How many kids could get meds they should not have before giving meds to kids is banned?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        Go back and reread what I said.

        Without a gender dysphoria diagnosis gender affirming care does not happen. When there is a medical diagnosis, desistance rates are very low.

        I know because it takes a diagnosis to get hormone blockers. They’re a prescription medication. How do you not understand this?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            We don’t know what that number is as the studies have methodological issues. As I already stated.

            But say it’s 10% and the suicide rate for youth with gender dyphoria is 20%. If you have 100 patients with gender dysphoria and you treat no one, 20 kids die. If you treat everyone all 100 kids live and 10 regret being put on hormones.

            In this case doing nothing causes the most harm. Do no harm includes harm reduction and harms caused by not acting.

            The Dr in this situation has an ethical duty to treat all of the patients. Even if desistance is a risk for some. Because death is the risk of doing nothing.