And someone just set himself on fire outside the courthouse!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      I mean… Technically speaking the guy didn’t really hurt anyone else… I don’t know that I’d call him a terrorist over this. Stupid? Maybe. Misguided? Most definitely. But if the only person he hurt is himself I don’t think that’s grounds to be called terrorism. Frankly I think a person should have the right to set themselves on fire if they want to. Same way they have the right, technically, to eat a bullet in the garage or take a long fall with a short rope. Nobody wants to see it happen, and it is “illegal” in such a fashion that emergency services can come legally enter your home without permission to prevent a suicide in progress, but the right to self harm should be covered under bodily autonomy. I’m not going to idolize this guy but I don’t think his name should be stricken from history as though this was some heinous act of terrorism. He aimed to sacrifice his own life and no one else’s to bring visibility to his protest. I may not agree with it but I think you should be allowed that.

      • @morphballganon
        link
        -3
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Willingly tying up emergency responders with a voluntary act of violence (so they are less able to respond to other emergencies) is terrorism.