I don’t blame them. Ukraine needs to take the war to Russia to win.

  • @rockSlayer
    link
    English
    610 months ago

    The UN isn’t in charge of war crimes.

    Neither is Duke. I would call an international convention of nations far more legitimate than any college on this matter.

    • Neuromancer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -710 months ago

      Then were the charges? Where is the UN voting to use force to arrest Putin ? Exactly. The UN is worthless.

          • @rockSlayer
            link
            English
            410 months ago

            Lol so fucking what? You’re wrong dude, it’s ok to admit it. There’s no shame in being wrong.

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -210 months ago

              I’m not wrong. You claim it’s always illegal. Yet your cites don’t say that. My cites say it is lot always illegal and explains why.

              We are talking about Ukraine attacking Russia. You are trying to oddly cite Russia attacking Ukraine.

              Just take an l and move on or actually cite your claim

              • @rockSlayer
                link
                English
                310 months ago

                I didn’t think I had to say this, but I’m arguing an ethical position that happens to coincide with international law. I think it’s always wrong to bomb infrastructure. In this war between Ukraine and Russia, it’s a definitive war crime and it would be a violation of international law for Ukraine to strike a power plant in Russia.

                The ethical position is that civilian infrastructure like power plants, hospitals, dams, bridges, etc should never be attacked. This is because fake justifications can be made to attack that infrastructure, as we see in Israel’s genocide.

                  • @rockSlayer
                    link
                    English
                    210 months ago

                    Nice observation. I’m arguing 2 compatible things simultaneously, one is legal that obviously has exceptions. The other is ethical to argue that the “exceptions” are just excuses for killing civilians.