Prosecutors made the unusual decision this week to remain almost entirely mum about the order in which they planned to call their first witnesses in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial in New York.

Joshua Steinglass, a prosecutor working on behalf of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, said Friday evening he would let Trump’s attorneys know the name of their first witness on Sunday night, the day before opening arguments in the case are set to begin, according to a report from the courtroom. Trump’s defense team had asked for the names of the first three witnesses that prosecutors would call.

“Mr. Trump has been tweeting about the witnesses," Steinglass told Judge Juan Merchan. "We’re not telling them who the witnesses are.”

Blanche then asked Merchan if he could have the information if he promised Trump would not post on social media about the witnesses, to which Merchan replied that he did not believe Blanche could make such a vow.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    721 month ago

    I get the feeling they’re trying to avoid martyrdom. He needs to go to prison for the big things, not on technicalities.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      841 month ago

      I don’t know, witness intimidation is pretty damn big. And a pretty damn big admission of guilt.

      • Skua
        link
        fedilink
        101 month ago

        The thing is, he wouldn’t do it openly. He’d pass the names to an assistant who would make some anonymous posts online and let it go from there. Sure, maybe that can be proven in another trial, but that’s too far away to help the witnesses or to avoid slowing this case

        • Flying Squid
          link
          281 month ago

          You’re talking about the guy who just says whatever the hell is on his mind at the time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 month ago

          He is too stupid to keep his mouth shut. The problem is the courts are too cowardly to enforce their own gag orders.

          “Please stop tweeting about the clerks and family members of the court.” [He immediately tweets about the clerks and family members.] “Oh, ok, please have a 10 day extension and we’ll give you a far lesser bond.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 month ago

            Once you put it like that, it’s just laughable how much they’ve pampered this asshole. And he still. Fucking. Complains.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              41 month ago

              The entire right wing and Christian movements in the US seems to be based on nothing on persecution syndrome. It’s just moaning about how oppressed they are day in an day out.

        • @Viking_Hippie
          link
          41 month ago

          he wouldn’t do it openly

          …where have you been for the past 7 years plus change?

          He does MOST of his crimes openly and the rest he publicly brags about later!

          There’s literally NO way he’d ever try to make his witness tampering discreet. That would be like expecting Guy Fieri to cook without ketchup 😛

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -141 month ago

        The thing is where will you house the orange asshole’s Secret Service detail in a prison?

        That’s gotta be a huge drawback for any judge to send him to prison during a trial.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            91 month ago

            If a U.S. President Goes to Prison, Does the Secret Service Go, Too?

            Under current United States federal law, all former presidents are entitled to lifetime protection from the Secret Service. Barring an act of Congress or a presidential executive order, the Secret Service is bound by law to protect former presidents for life. There aren’t any exceptions listed in the statute governing the protection of former presidents.

            Trump’s various indictments have left many wondering if the Secret Service would accompany Trump (or any other convicted former president) to prison.

            “Yes, no question,” said Ronald Kessler, author of two books about the Secret Service: “In the President’s Secret Service” and “The First Family Detail.” “There wouldn’t be a Secret Service agent inside his cell, but I expect that there would be two agents outside of his cell, two agents in the corridor leading up to the cell block and another two agents at the entrance to the prison.”

            Other commentators, including a former Secret Service agent, have said that as few as two Secret Service agents could be posted at the prison, but Kessler called that “crazy.”

            *** There are multiple links in the article that I haven’t transferred here.

            • borari
              link
              fedilink
              121 month ago

              Personally I think that any former president who winds up incarcerated should have to serve their time in the military side of Leavenworth, but that’s just me. The Secret Service would have a much easier time integrating into a system run by MPs than civilian prison guards.

              • @mPony
                link
                41 month ago

                There’s got to be a spare supply closet somewhere: use that. and make sure they don’t use Epstein-brand video cameras.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              “Don’t deserve” is a completely different thing that “Won’t get” which seems important to point out because your response is about the latter.

        • Optional
          link
          21 month ago

          They sit outside the cell, obviously.

    • @RunawayFixer
      link
      231 month ago

      I think many consider witness intimidation to be a big thing. Threatening judges/advocates/… is big, doxing their families as a form of intimidation goes beyond even that. They should have never let them (not just Trump, but also others who were making threats or encouraging others to make threats) get away with it.

      That it gets a pass as “not bad enough” is indicative of how far the USA civil society has fallen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      He needs to not be treated like a fucking king because he isn’t one. Presidents are just people who happen to be elected, and shouldn’t get treated like royalty.

      Worrying about making him a martyr is counterproductive.

      • @Viking_Hippie
        link
        51 month ago

        Presidents are just people who happen to be elected

        Some of them not even that, such as himself and first term Dubya.

    • @LEDZeppelin
      link
      51 month ago

      He is already claiming to be a martyr since being charged for all the civil and criminal indictments