• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Download itself is also a network terminology, referring to incoming data, moving to you, also known as RX and TX in shorter form.

    This is just about the only correct statement in this rambling mess of a comment. Yes, downloading means that data is moving to your system.

    So, given that fact, how do you imagine that your web browser displays an image without downloading it? How does the data comprising the content of the image end up on your system in order for the web browser to render it without traveling to it from the server; ie, being “downloaded”?

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -137 months ago

      So, given that fact, how do you imagine that your web browser displays an image without downloading it? How does the data comprising the content of the image end up on your system in order for the web browser to set it without traveling to it from the server; ie, being “downloaded”?

      like i said it’s all semantic. In this case, download is almost certainly being used to describe a scenario where the original image was sent in whatsapp, and then downloaded to the phone locally, and found on the phones filesystem. Otherwise we would not be using the term download here. That could be a language barrier thing i suppose. But in the contexts of what it’s implying, i doubt it.

      likewise, i could just as easily argue that everything you “post” on the internet is actually an upload, and as a result, you upload every interaction you have on the internet, however it’s only contextually used to describe something like “uploading a youtube video” where there a very clear contextual meaning presented. Same thing with download, people download games, but listen to the music or “stream” it from spotify, it’s technically downloading, but it’s actually not.

      Going by the contextual, and colloquially referred to definition of “download” (hell the article linked literally says “he watched it for two years” so try to semantic that one out) download in isolation, is the flow of traffic to you, from somewhere else, downloading, downloaded, or a download, that verb usage of it, as opposed to an adjective usage of it, is completely different. The article does not say “download” it says “downloaded, downloading” and any potentially related forms of that word refer to the act of download, of which is being locally and explicitly stored on your device. The only instance where this wouldn’t apply is if he didn’t download it (notice the verb form usage) and it was actually cached by whatsapp, and that somehow lead to him being arrested.

      Which is a possibility, but is also a completely different scenario.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        likewise, i could just as easily argue that everything you “post” on the internet is actually an upload, and as a result, you upload every interaction you have on the internet

        Yes. Again, that’s literally what is actually happening.

        You keep throwing out these statements like “Oh, well if that’s true then we might as well also say this is true” and then “this” turns out to be just the most banal shit.

        I genuinely don’t think you even know what it is you’re trying to argue here. You’re either so down in the weeds of some bizarre semantic sophistry that you’ve lost track of daylight, or you’re arguing points that no one else was disagreeing on while acting like you’ve just dropped the Pentagon Papers.

        Either way, I really can’t be bothered anymore. I’ve tried my best, but it’s like trying to teach a pigeon to read.

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          You keep throwing out these statements like “Oh, well if that’s true then we might as well also say this is true” and then “this” turns out to be just the most banal shit.

          I genuinely don’t think you even know what it is you’re trying to argue here. You’re either so down in the weeds of some bizarre semantic sophistry that you’ve lost track of daylight, or you’re arguing points that no one else was disagreeing on while acting like you’ve just dropped the Pentagon Papers.

          i literally started this entire thread off based on semantic technicalities, why are we acting like this ISN’T what im talking about? Nobody should be shocked by this. I didn’t come to argue the legality of holding CP because if i did, it would be very short, it’s illegal, plain and simple, that’s how the law in the US works.