• Flying Squid
        link
        12 months ago

        Then I don’t really understand your criticism.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’m criticizing Australia for trying to tell South Koreans what content they can share online with other South Koreans, amongst other things. Australia isn’t the World Police. I can freely join you in despising Elon Musk while still being very critical of the Aussie government.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            12 months ago

            So then Twitter should not adhere to what Musk personally said they would adhere to.

            Because the Christchurch Call doesn’t say that terrorism videos should be taken down on a country-by-country basis.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              So then Twitter should not adhere to what Musk personally said they would adhere to.

              Why the hell not?

              Because the Christchurch Call doesn’t say that terrorism videos should be taken down on a country-by-country basis.

              An agreement Twitter consentually signed/agreed to is radically different from what the Aussie govt is trying to do here. Why are you conflating the two?

              • Flying Squid
                link
                12 months ago

                The Aussie government is literally trying to get Twitter to delete the tweets that promote terrorism as Twitter agreed to when it agreed to the Christchurch Call.

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      Here’s a doozy:

      The current Christchurch Call website shows Xitter as a signatory. What if man child demands that his company is taken off the website and it refuses?