@[email protected] to PC [email protected] • 5 months agoAMD rumored to use 'slow' 18Gbps GDDR6 in RDNA 4 — leaker says Team Red's next generation GPUs won't use GDDR7www.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up152arrow-down13
arrow-up149arrow-down1external-linkAMD rumored to use 'slow' 18Gbps GDDR6 in RDNA 4 — leaker says Team Red's next generation GPUs won't use GDDR7www.tomshardware.com@[email protected] to PC [email protected] • 5 months agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareAtHeartEngineerlink19•5 months agoTotally fine with me, I just want more vram, way more vram
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•5 months agoSame. Get me a card with an older chip that has 32/64 gigs of just-decent VRAM but they won’t do it!
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️linkfedilink4•5 months agoWho needs texture compression or advanced streaming techniques when you can just have all 200GB of data in memory at once?
minus-squareAtHeartEngineerlink2•5 months agoFor gaming, the improvement in cores matters much more than the memory bandwidth, and for machine learning, more memory is needed desperately, so a new core with more vram, even if it’s not the latest hot shit vram, I would be totally happy with.
Totally fine with me, I just want more vram, way more vram
Same. Get me a card with an older chip that has 32/64 gigs of just-decent VRAM but they won’t do it!
128gb of gddr5! Lol
Who needs texture compression or advanced streaming techniques when you can just have all 200GB of data in memory at once?
For gaming, the improvement in cores matters much more than the memory bandwidth, and for machine learning, more memory is needed desperately, so a new core with more vram, even if it’s not the latest hot shit vram, I would be totally happy with.