Using Australian laws to force a foreign-owned platform to take down content globally sets a risky precedent – should we allow all countries to impose their laws on the internet?

Do Australian courts have the right to decide what foreign citizens, located overseas, view online on a foreign-owned platform?

Anyone inclined to answer “yes” to this question should perhaps also ask themselves whether they are equally happy for courts in China, Russia and Iran to determine what Australians can see and post online in Australia.

This is the problem with global “take-down orders”, an issue we now must confront in light of the Australian eSafety commissioner demanding that social media platform X (formerly Twitter) remove videos of a violent stabbing at a church in Sydney.

  • MHLoppyOP
    6•9 months ago

    The article’s point is that there isn’t really a distinction between the two legally.

      • HanrahanEnglish
        1•8 months ago

        I saw Gab went long in the umbrage of them being asked to take it downs and treated with some disdain the Australian Government take down notice. :)

    • @[email protected]
      2•9 months ago

      That’s a failure of the law then.

      There’s a clear distinction any way you slice it between broadcasting a violent assault and propaganda. Free speech isn’t absolute anywhere.