What is this? Some sort of ‘protect the children because they’re totally not using apples and soda cans’ bullshit?

Why is this in any way necessary or even useful?

Edit: Just discovered this was about tobacco, making this even stupider since this product isn’t for tobacco, it’s for cannabis. https://dclcorp.com/blog/news/pact-act-impacts-vape-industry/

  • Flying SquidOP
    link
    English
    -18 months ago

    The source is an article talking about the law, not the law itself. The law itself is quoted and does not make it clear that it is also about cannabis, which is the problem.

    Laws should be clear and precise. I’m not sure why people think otherwise.

    • @SchmidtGenetics
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s covered by the fucking smoking law that covers both. It can be used for tobacco, so it’s has to be covered for all angles, even cannabis, since that’s illegal to smoke like nicotine for smoking laws………

      I’m sorry you can’t comprehend how laws are intertwined, but you’ve also had a dozen people tell you the exact same thing.

      Its not easy to explain to you that your shoe is untied is it?

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        English
        08 months ago

        Then cannabis should be mentioned in the law. I don’t know why it can’t be.

        • @SchmidtGenetics
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Why? Because the US congress is a joke, the law would need to be amended, some Jhole is going to put some other legislation with it, or turn it into a crusade so it doesn’t pass. This works.

          It’s a nicotine product, done.

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            English
            -18 months ago

            Does it work? Because kids don’t have to sign for a pipe or a bong.

            • @SchmidtGenetics
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Can a kid go into a headshop and buy one? Bongs can get there too if it’s an issue, but you don’t see many people hitting bongs on the street, while anyone can “discretely” use a vape and you don’t know what it is, and that can also be another issue.

              • Flying SquidOP
                link
                English
                -1
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                A kid can’t go into a head shop and buy a vaporizer either. Because kids can’t go into head shops. This isn’t about head shops. This is about ordering things over the internet. If you order a cannabis vaporizer online, which is less common to imbibe weed with and generally more expensive, you have to sign for it when it’s delivered. If you order a bong or a pipe online, you don’t. That makes zero sense.

                • @SchmidtGenetics
                  link
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Because one can be used on the street where it’s illegal to use nicotine and cannabis, while the other is painfully obvious you are breaking federal law if you were to do so.

                  Vaping makes it easier to smoke illegally in public, nicotine and cannabis. And now it’s also getting in the hands of minors where they can do both in public and no one would know. Thats the fucking problem. It’s illegal to smoke in public, now minors are involved.

                  But officer it’s legal CBD! It’s illegal to smoke in public!!!

                  • Flying SquidOP
                    link
                    English
                    -18 months ago

                    So you’re saying this stops kids from using cannabis on the street (despite the fact that cannabis vaporizers also smell) but in no other way stops them using it? What’s the point of that? They just go use it in the park anyway.