• @RapidcreekOP
    link
    English
    66 months ago

    Very true. If they didn’t have bad luck, they’d have no luck at all.

    • @ours
      link
      English
      126 months ago

      No bad luck needed when the World turned on them when they won their freedom. It may no longer be the case but such a scar leaves long lasting effects.

      • @RapidcreekOP
        link
        English
        -56 months ago

        They had bad luck choosing leaders. They had bad luck with the earthquake. The UN and US has come to their rescue many times.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          96 months ago

          The US previously invaded Haiti in 1915, then intercedes in 1994, after a miltary coup in 1991, and reinstalls a former President (Aristide). Notably they did nothing to help Haiti when Papa and Baby Doc Duvalier were murdering thousands under their dictatorships.

          America has only been hands-off when it suited their needs.

          • @RapidcreekOP
            link
            English
            -76 months ago

            America has only been hands-off when it suited their needs.

            Sure, let’s forget a 9.0 earthquake when US doctors flew into help, a US warship was floated into the harbor to provide water. US troops came to help. It was all because it suited US needs…

              • @RapidcreekOP
                link
                English
                -56 months ago

                That makes no sense. You should stop.

            • @anticolonialist
              link
              English
              -16 months ago

              The US offers nothing that doesn’t come with strings attached

              • @RapidcreekOP
                link
                English
                0
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                What strings could Haiti possibly provide?