• @iopq
    link
    -168 months ago

    Cost of living is inflation, which this chart takes into account

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      68 months ago

      Sure, but inflation doesn’t factor in price hikes, for instance medical insurance, drug prices, house prices, rent, collage tuition or new expenditures that didn’t exist 20 years ago. These don’t follow the curve of inflation, they are artificialy inflated which is shown in increased profit margins.

      • @iopq
        link
        -88 months ago

        Rent is literally a third of inflation calculation

        How do you complain it doesn’t factor it when it’s the biggest contributor?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          Dude, I’m not complaining I’m giving you examples of things that they don’t account for. Rent is different, you have landlords jacking the price to an extreme, and then you have those who follow the inflation curve. It’s just dishonest.

          • @iopq
            link
            -4
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            That list is wrong because they do account for those things

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              You were proven wrong by another user, you’ve linked a graph with no sources or explanation.wjatvdo you expect?

              • @iopq
                link
                -18 months ago

                No, the inflation literally tracks housing costs. There are valid criticisms, and there’s not knowing what you’re talking about

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  18 months ago

                  you are the one misleading people posting graphs with no context, sorry but you are the one who make false assumption based on the graphs you are posting.

                  • @iopq
                    link
                    -18 months ago

                    Which false assumptions? I explain my points clearly without brushing off other people. Be specific

    • @webadict
      link
      68 months ago

      Repeat same talking point.

      The things you say are useless, especially since these are adjusted by household size. Do one that isn’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -28 months ago

        Repeat same talking point.

        I’m not saying I agree with them, but they are the only ones providing actual data. Everyone else, including you, is just attacking and downvoting them. I would be interested in hearing an actual argument, but to accuse them of just “repeating a talking point” while they provide data and you provide nothing but a talking point is ridiculously hypocritical.

        • @webadict
          link
          28 months ago

          Their data is adjusted for family size. Family size has been consistently shrinking since the 1960s, which, if you adjust their graph, will lead to overall decrease in wages throughout time. It is a meaningless method of transformation to get data that supports a false narrative.

          Why did you not point out that their data is transformed when I did?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -28 months ago

            You still haven’t provided any actual data. Again, you just hand wave it away.

            I’m not saying you’re wrong, I tend to believe you are right in fact, but if you can’t be arsed to actually defend your position - that’s fine - but its then hypocritical to claim the other person just repeating a talking point.