• @grue
    link
    English
    47 months ago

    Yes, what you’re saying is foolish.

    It’s an issue of low density. Having single-family houses spread apart with lawns necessarily lowers the viability of methods other than driving because e.g. you have to walk farther to get to destinations, there are fewer riders per mile along the transit line, etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Look you don’t know what you’re talking about and it’s fine

      The roads do way more for spreading people apart than the lawns do

      Whether you have grass or trees on people’s property does not impact density

      • @grue
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Whether you build a single-family house with a yard or an apartment building on a lot absolutely impacts density. Hell, even among single-family houses, whether the minimum lot size is 9000 square feet or two acres (real zoning categories on my city, BTW) absolutely impacts density.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -27 months ago

          An apartment with a lawn vs an apartment without doesn’t impact density

          Nor does a two hectare lot with one vs a two hectare lot without

          • @grue
            link
            English
            4
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You just keep insisting on missing the point, don’t you? This thread is not actually about grass vs. other plants with density held equal, and never was.