boredsquirrel (he)@slrpnk.net to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-22 years agoOpinion: GNOME vs. macOS user experiencewww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square208linkfedilinkarrow-up1238arrow-down149file-text
arrow-up1189arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: GNOME vs. macOS user experiencewww.youtube.comboredsquirrel (he)@slrpnk.net to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-22 years agomessage-square208linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareepochdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down14·2 years agoI have a MacBook Pro and I recently tried GNOME3 for the million time. macOS wins. GNOME3 sucks.
minus-squareboredsquirrel (he)@slrpnk.netOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 years agoWell GNOME evolved a ton. I agree GNOME 3 looked horrible, GNOME 43+ is really slick
minus-squareepochdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·2 years agoIt evolved, and still sucks…
minus-squareTheGrandNaguslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoIt really doesn’t. Perhaps you just have bad taste or something.
minus-squareGreatDong3000@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoAin’t no way you really meant to say gnome 3 right?
minus-squareepochdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoGNOME3 will always be the succesor of the defunct GNOME2. It doesn’t matter that you call it GNOME 43 because of the version.
I have a MacBook Pro and I recently tried GNOME3 for the million time. macOS wins. GNOME3 sucks.
Well GNOME evolved a ton. I agree GNOME 3 looked horrible, GNOME 43+ is really slick
It evolved, and still sucks…
It really doesn’t. Perhaps you just have bad taste or something.
Yeah, sure.
Ain’t no way you really meant to say gnome 3 right?
The very same.
GNOME 3 is from 2011
GNOME3 will always be the succesor of the defunct GNOME2. It doesn’t matter that you call it GNOME 43 because of the version.