@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-27 months agoOpinion: GNOME vs. macOS user experiencewww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square211fedilinkarrow-up1238arrow-down149file-text
arrow-up1189arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: GNOME vs. macOS user experiencewww.youtube.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-27 months agomessage-square211fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@epochlink-6•7 months agoI have a MacBook Pro and I recently tried GNOME3 for the million time. macOS wins. GNOME3 sucks.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink3•7 months agoWell GNOME evolved a ton. I agree GNOME 3 looked horrible, GNOME 43+ is really slick
minus-square@TheGrandNaguslinkEnglish2•7 months agoIt really doesn’t. Perhaps you just have bad taste or something.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•7 months agoAin’t no way you really meant to say gnome 3 right?
minus-square@epochlink1•7 months agoGNOME3 will always be the succesor of the defunct GNOME2. It doesn’t matter that you call it GNOME 43 because of the version.
I have a MacBook Pro and I recently tried GNOME3 for the million time. macOS wins. GNOME3 sucks.
Well GNOME evolved a ton. I agree GNOME 3 looked horrible, GNOME 43+ is really slick
It evolved, and still sucks…
It really doesn’t. Perhaps you just have bad taste or something.
Yeah, sure.
Ain’t no way you really meant to say gnome 3 right?
The very same.
GNOME 3 is from 2011
GNOME3 will always be the succesor of the defunct GNOME2. It doesn’t matter that you call it GNOME 43 because of the version.