• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -18 months ago

    You misunderstand. It was never a mistake. It was always an unfinished project because no one gave a flying…for anything that was of zero value.

    Just because you want to use a tweak that carries too little organization and don’t care for the much more efficient method they replaced it with doesn’t mean you can’t go use gorram any other desktop.

    Bye!

    • @TCB13
      link
      English
      -3
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It was always an unfinished project because no one gave a flying

      No, I didn’t misunderstood, I know it was yet another GNOME unfinished project. Both the native thing and the extensions always had/have the same problems - drag and drop from apps never working properly, the icon grid behaves incorrectly sometimes and other cosmetic glitches.

      for anything that was of zero value.

      Now this is the thing, desktop icons are basic DE functionality and even Apple - the guys that actually know how to design anything - agree they should be there… at least with an option to turn them ON/OFF. The removal of desktop icons was simply the “GNOME vision” being used as an excuse not the fix something that was hard to fix.

        • @TCB13
          link
          English
          08 months ago

          The funny thing is that you can’t prove me wrong there, apparently not even provide valid arguments, just add a pile of ramblings and insults.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            08 months ago

            Same to you. The difference is that I use GNOME with zero interest in the most antiquated, ugly, distraction, and disorganization written by some who got his written code stolen by a pedophile who conned morons like you into preaching his fraudulent not-his-software mass-thief and delusional solicitation.