• WideEyedStupid
    link
    6
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Nobody is coercing you to do anything when your employer doesn’t want people spreading disease in their company. Nobody is coercing anyone if e.g. hospitals refuse to hire someone who hasn’t had certain vaccinations. It has nothing to do with coercion. It has to do with the fact that actions and choices have consequences. You don’t get to willingly disregard (the safety of) everyone else and expect to be welcome everywhere.

    If I choose not to shower, and stink to high heaven, some employers won’t hire me. If I choose not to wear shoes, or walk around in my underwear, I will be denied access to many places. Does this mean I am being coerced to shower and wear clothes?

    Actions have consequences. It’s just that simple. You can always choose to not do x, but when it’s a requirement for y, you won’t get to do y unless you do x. And speaking of rights, what about everyone else’s rights to not have to sit/work/eat/wait next to Typhoid Mary? Or is it really your opinion that whatever someone does, their right to do whatever is more important than the rest of society? Do you think businesses should be forced to allow anyone inside no matter what? Employers are not allowed to set requirements for their employees?

    • @John_McMurray
      link
      -71 month ago

      Long answer to a different point, don’t care, try responding to what I actually said.

      • WideEyedStupid
        link
        61 month ago

        It’s the exact same point. You disingenuously calling it “government coercion” doesn’t change anything.

        But thank you for pointing out you don’t actually care. Means I don’t have to waste more time on this. I wish you a pleasant day.

      • @Boxtifer
        link
        41 month ago

        Dude that’s so rude and doesn’t net you any points in your argument. Gotta respect people.