She decided to kill the 14-month-old dog she was training to hunt birds when it attacked chickens, an understandable mistake for a young dog IMO, and bit her once when she grabbed it’s collar (no word on how seriously). She killed a goat by shooting it twice because she didn’t like it, calling it mean and smelly. Apparently she’s also recently put down 3 horses for unspecified reasons.
She deliberately included it in her new book “to illustrate her willingness, in politics as well as in South Dakota life, to do anything ‘difficult, messy and ugly’ if it simply needs to be done.” When criticized she said, "I guess if I were a better politician I wouldn’t tell the story here.”
Sometimes animals do need to be euthanized, but it’s rarely a first choice. Animal lovers and those who hunt with dogs have not been kind in their appraisals of the decisions. It’s just a meme and maybe I don’t need to worry, but her talk about carrying that attitude into politics puts me off.
Finally, Trump is old, unhealthy and there’s fears he’s showing signs of dementia. So this time VP choice might really matter a few years down the road.
Yes. What she means to be done is literally murdering innocent citizens and she’s trying to prepare Americans to justify standing around when they start it.
And if you’re reading this and that’s even mildly a surprise, instead of OBVIOUS, then you’re gonna be the one standing around while some Christian tortures me or makes me watch my husband be tortured
Maybe I’m just having a hard time imagining someone deranged enough to both kill a pet puppy and also tell the world about it.
But I 100% assume she is dogwhistling to the other Repubs that she will execute their political opponents. She is willing to murder socialists, LGBT people, and so on down their list of “undesirables.”
Either that or she is actually deranged enough to kill a puppy for her failure to train it and still believe she is in the right. If that’s the case she’d be executing people anyway.