• @disguy_ovahea
    link
    1
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m on your side, but you keep missing the point. If you’re in charge of people that need to do a job, and while they are getting the work done, they seem miserable. Wouldn’t you give enough fucks to find out why? Standing there and saying, “well I can’t fire them because they’re doing the work” is the real problem. Not the definition of engagement.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Why do you think someone doing their job and not going above and beyond is likely to mean they are also miserable?

      I would expect someone who just does the job they signed up for to be happier than someone who thinks they have to go above and beyond.

      • @disguy_ovahea
        link
        -1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It doesn’t matter if they’re meeting or exceeding expectations. Performance is measured independently of morale and engagement. If you meet expectations, but you’re unhappy at work, a decent leader will ask why and try to make your work life better.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          Cringe. Work managers aren’t leaders nor should they be, they’re just pencil pushers who got promoted out of whatever they were good at and are now going through the motions.

          • @disguy_ovahea
            link
            -12 months ago

            Isn’t this work reform? Why would you not expect more from the people you work for?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              The whole system had to change, a new pool table for the office or this managerial engagement boosting working class oppression tactic isn’t work reform.