• BlackEco
    link
    fedilink
    97
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Soon we will have to call it GNU/systemd/Linux

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      478 months ago

      Nah. Replacing the kernel is probably planned for the next point release - it’ll just be GNU/systemd

      • @optissima
        link
        48 months ago

        Can we rename it GNUtriSystemD?

    • @TheGrandNagus
      link
      English
      25
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I mean it should kind of already be something like GNU/SystemD/X11/PipeWire/Linux, I guess.

      It’s not like the GNU utils are the only massive integral part of the OS. I think GNU/Linux caught on squarely because many people follow Stallman, and that’s how he wants people to refer to it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        It definitely made way more sense at early on. I mean GNU made most of UX of using Linux at some point. Systemd, and the browser now make a much bigger portion than before, and the world is more than GNOME now too.

    • Lexi Sneptaur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      188 months ago

      Systemd makes life easy. It also makes Linux more teachable. I like accessibility and don’t even mind this

      • topperharlie
        link
        188 months ago

        hard disagree. life with plain text logs and daemon init scripts was so easy and nice. But we can’t have nice things…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          328 months ago

          Those hacked together system-specific bash scripts were shit. Having a standard way of creating, starting, ensuring restarts,and logging services is so much better.

          You can still get all the plain text logs you like.

          • @baru
            link
            68 months ago

            Those hacked together system-specific bash scripts were shit.

            With a different feature set per script as well. The systemd service files have often been pushed upstream.

            Pretty sure people liking those scripts never really tried dealing with them across distributions. Though this just rehashes things that were said when distributions decided if to switch to systemd. Still the same strange claim that those scripts are somehow easier. It wasn’t, it is also way easier to package a systemd file from upstream than to maintain that stuff within a distribution.

          • trevor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48 months ago

            How do you get plain-text logs instead of the garbage binary format that journalctl forces on you?

            • 2xsaiko
              link
              fedilink
              148 months ago

              Set ForwardToSyslog=yes in journald.conf and install a syslog daemon. Also optionally Storage=volatile (I wouldn’t set Storage=none unless you want systemd to no longer show you any logs anywhere including in systemctl status because I assume it will do that)

              • @AA5B
                link
                -18 months ago

                Definitely reads like a Microsoft answer, seems so much easier than just reading text

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              By configuring journald to forward messages to syslog as is the default.

              “forces on you” 🙄

              Edit: Systemd has been around for 14 years. Did you never think to google this?

              • 2xsaiko
                link
                fedilink
                18 months ago

                It’s not the default fwiw. From journald.conf(5):

                By default, only forwarding to wall is enabled.

        • TimeSquirrel
          link
          fedilink
          198 months ago

          You know what’s nice? Being able to sit down at any Linux distro and being able to set up and configure services without Googling how to use that particular distro’s init system.

      • @herrvogel
        link
        17
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        But it’s so unbearably slow.

        Me when my computer that has a typical uptime of 37 days boots up in 7 seconds with systemd instead of 5.5 seconds with runit: 😡😡😡😡

        • @MeanEYE
          link
          58 months ago

          First time I am hearing that systemd boots slower.

          • @herrvogel
            link
            18 months ago

            Oh no systemd made you deaf won’t someone PLEASE stop systemd’s reign of terror oh the humanity

            • lastweakness
              link
              18 months ago

              Idk why the downvotes… This is funny af

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        I’m not on the systemd hate train by any means, but I don’t understand how this is any improvement over pkexec

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          I don’t understand how this is any improvement over pkexec

          That has the same problem as sudo: the SUID bit is set for it.

          The fact that run0 uses polkit is more of a byproduct that this kinda authentication is already done with polkit all over the place in systemd. You can have individual subcommand accessible to different users (for example everyone can systemctl status, but systemctl reboot needs to be in the wheel group) which is why its generally used within systemd already. And it wouldn’t surprise me if again you can do it with this as well, limiting what commands can unconditionally run, need prompt or are completely blocked.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            68 months ago

            As long as you have polkit setup to work in terminal sessions, yes. This is pretty standard these days, though not particularly widely used.