It wasn’t in the boing boing article, but this is according to the Washington Post:
Climax CEO Oliver Zahn accused the foundation of caving to pressure from dairy cheesemakers in revoking the award. And then he spilled the curds: Climax, it turns out, wasn’t just a finalist — it was set to win the award, a fact that all parties are asked to keep confidential until the official ceremony in Portland, Ore., but was revealed in an email the foundation sent to Climax in January. Based on that information, Zahn and several of his colleagues had planned to attend, booking hotel rooms and making travel plans, until, he says, learning from this reporter that his cheese was no longer in the running.
If you’ve been emailed “please prepare for attendance to the award ceremony” and your attendance is suddenly no longer required because you’ve been disqualified, that sort of speaks volumes to the mechanics at play. It doesn’t outright prove you were going to win, but you don’t owe the competition runners any benefit of the doubt when they had every opportunity to communicate this and make a decision before it got to the point it did.
This is a bald faced lie. The headline says
but it hadn’t won:
Being named a finalist isn’t winning.
I’m astonished that they lie so brazenly. And I’m very disappointed that this community repeats the lie. OP you should be ashamed.
It wasn’t in the boing boing article, but this is according to the Washington Post:
Well yes, but actually no.
Being set to win an award is not winning an award. It’s a less heinous lie but it is still a lie.
If you’ve been emailed “please prepare for attendance to the award ceremony” and your attendance is suddenly no longer required because you’ve been disqualified, that sort of speaks volumes to the mechanics at play. It doesn’t outright prove you were going to win, but you don’t owe the competition runners any benefit of the doubt when they had every opportunity to communicate this and make a decision before it got to the point it did.
Every tribe moves the goalposts.
I just used the headline of the article. And the article is factual, so I don‘t really See the problem.
😩 people missing the field for the trees.
You don’t see any problem in posting a headline which is a lie?
Edit: tumbleweed Yeah.
They just fucking proved it WASN’T factual, the fuck you mean???
People like you make the rest of us look foolish, shame on you.