• ☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    @Cowbee
    Libertarian Communism and Anarcho-Communism are just different titles for the same ideology.

    I disagree that communism has to be globally achieved and can’t be achieved in one country. If a country can create a strong enough decentralized military and has access to the necessary resources for their survival then communism can be achieved in one country.

    As I’ve previously stated, Libertarian Communism hasn’t been given a chance to be properly implemented, mostly due to the…

      • Cowbee [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        I believe at that point you are making a semantical argument on what is considered centralized vs decentralized, and what is and isn’t a state. A fully unified army of similar power would defeat a decentralized army, which necessitates some level of democratic centralism, by which point you have a state. Additionally, how do you see abolishing money while being invaded by Capitalist neighbors, as has happened to all AES countries?

        I don’t believe Anarchism is more likely to succeed than Marxism in establishing Communism.

        • ☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
          link
          fedilink
          07 months ago

          @Cowbee
          A military being decentralized doesn’t mean that it won’t be fully unified. A decentralized military doesn’t imply disorganization; rather, it allows for localized decision-making while still creating a cohesive unity through collective goals and voluntary cooperation.

          The abolition of money would still be possible even with threats of invasion or outright invasions by capitalist governments. In fact, removing the incentive for profit-seeking and resource exploitation inherent in…

          • ☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
            link
            fedilink
            07 months ago

            @Cowbee
            …monetary systems would strengthen defense against aggression by creating genuine solidarity and more of a focus on mutual aid and collective security.

            • Cowbee [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              27 months ago

              I believe this is just vibes-based analysis that dismisses what has materially been seen when attempted in real life. I won’t say that Anarcho-Communism isn’t more beautiful of an idea, but I also don’t believe it to be practical at the scale required to defend a revolution from outside aggressors.

              • ☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
                link
                fedilink
                07 months ago

                @Cowbee
                Libertarian Communism can be practical at a scale required to defend a revolution from foreign defenders due to its emphasis on decentralized, community-based defense strategies that empower individuals to protect their communities collectively, which in turn creates a strong sense of solidarity and resilience against external threats.

                • Cowbee [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  27 months ago

                  This was tried and lasted merely 2 years in Catalonia before more organized millitaries handily beat the Anarchists. The strength of worker-movements lies in unity, not individualism. A strong sense of solidarity is nice, but ideals cannot beat proper organization.

                  • ☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭
                    link
                    fedilink
                    07 months ago

                    @Cowbee
                    I know that the strength of workers’ movements resides in unity, not individualism. Libertarian Communism, or at least Platformism, is an ideology of ideological unity first and any individualism is within the context of the greater working-class movement. It’s also important to note that the Catalonian anarchists were defeated for various reasons, including external military pressure, internal divisions, and the challenges of implementing radical social change amidst broader…